FOR TIPS, gUIDES & TUTORIALS

subscribe to our Youtube

GO TO YOUTUBE

14455 questions

17168 answers

28195 comments

0 members

We are migrating to our new platform at https://community.teltonika.lt. Moving forward, you can continue discussions on this new platform. This current platform will be temporarily maintained for reference purposes.
0 votes
150 views 0 comments
by anonymous

I am evaluating these products for including to our infrastructure.
Both devices should do fine according to specifications.

It seems that their firmware are living a separate life according to the changlog:
https://wiki.teltonika-networks.com/view/RUT240_Firmware_Downloads
https://wiki.teltonika-networks.com/view/RUT950_Firmware_Downloads

What is the reason behind this? I was expecting them to run very similar firmwares.
Our top priorities are stable internet access and long time support. Which version do you recommend?

What are the real differences?

(I found the comparison link, but it really does not answer my question)

1 Answer

0 votes
by anonymous
Hello,

They're both very different and alike at the same time. To this day they both run stable firmware and modem, the only difference is hardware capabilities. According to your priorities, I would suggest picking RUT950, its CPU is a little bit faster and it has more RAM. Software more or less is alike.

https://teltonika-networks.com/lt/compare/?networking=rut240,rut950

EB.